Alongside today’s announcement of their new Turing GPU architecture, NVIDIA has also announced the first three products that will use the first Turing GPU. Breaking from tradition, NVIDIA has announced the workstation-class Quadro parts first. Part of the new Quadro RTX family, the Quadro RTX 8000, RTX 6000, and RTX 5000 are NVIDIA’s fastest workstation cards yet, and are set to arrive in the fourth quarter of this year.

For complete details on the Turing architecture, please see our companion article. But in short Turing is an evolution of the Volta architecture, taking everything that made the GV100 fast, and then improving on it. For professional visualization (ProViz) users, the big news here is that the cards feature hardware ray tracing acceleration, thanks to the combination of NVIDIA’s new RT cores, and the tensor cores brought over from Volta. Used together, the new cores can be used to speed up ray tracing, and then implement further post-processing tricks to cut down on the amount of work required to generate a photorealistic image.

The new GPUs and resulting Quadro cards are also the first NVIDIA cards to get GDDR6 memory – up to 48GB of it – doubling the amount of memory available versus NVIDIA’s Quadro P6000, and also offering a significant bandwidth increase at the same time. Going one step further, NVIDIA has also included support for NVLink, their proprietary multi-GPU cache coherent interlink, which will allow Quadro RTX cards to be installed in pairs and share their frame buffer memory. NVLInk isn’t as good as local memory, but with a reported 100GB/sec of bandwidth between the two cards, it’s also nothing to sneeze at.

As a result of these features NVIDIA is aiming very hard at the visual effects industry (e.g. movie and TV production), as they are some of the most demanding users in terms of performance needs, and have some of the deepest pockets as well. NVIDIA of course is no stranger to this market, but this is the biggest play they’ve ever made for it. They greatly want to bend users away from CPU-based ray tracing farms and on to more compact GPU farms.

This also means that NVIDIA has been pushing very hard behind the scenes to get software ready for their cards and the underlying RTX ray tracing functionality. While we’re still in the very early days, NVIDIA has already lined up Autodesk, Adobe, the Chaos Group, Dassault Systèmes, and of course Epic Games (among others) to support the technology in some fashion. There’s still a definite chicken-or-the-egg element in play, but NVIDIA is making a concentrated effort to get the proverbial eggs out there.

NVIDIA Quadro Specification Comparison
  RTX 8000 RTX 6000 RTX 5000 GV100
CUDA Cores 4608 4608 3072 5120
Tensor Cores 576 576 384 640
Boost Clock ~1730MHz? ~1730MHz? ? ~1450MHz
Memory Clock 14Gbps GDDR6 14Gbps GDDR6 14Gbps GDDR6 1.7Gbps HBM2
Memory Bus Width 384-bit 384-bit 256-bit 4096-bit
VRAM 48GB 24GB 16GB 32GB
ECC ? ? ? Full
Half Precision 32 TFLOPs? 32 TFLOPs? ? 29.6 TFLOPs
Single Precision 16 TFLOPs 16 TFLOPs ? 14.8 TFLOPs
Tensor Performance 500T OPs
500T OPs
? 118.5 TFLOPs
Ray Performance 10 GRays/s 10 GRays/s 6 GRays/s N/A
TDP ? ? ? 250W
GPU Unnamed Turing Unnamed Turing Unnamed Turing GV100
Architecture Turing Turing Turing Volta
Manufacturing Process ? ? ? TSMC 12nm FFN
Launch Price $10,000 $6,300 $2,300 $9,000
Launch Date Q4 2018 Q4 2018 Q4 2018 March 2018

All told, there are 3 Quadro RTX cards initially launching. The Quadro RTX 8000 and RTX 6000 are nearly spitting images of each other; both offer the same GPU performance and memory bandwidth thanks to the combination of 4608 CUDA cores, 576 tensor cores, and GDDR6 memory. The difference between the two is that the RTX 8000 is equipped with a full 48GB of VRAM (24 chips in a clamshell configuration), while the RTX 6000 has just 24GB of VRAM. It’s only in the final card of the stack, the RTX 5000, that NVIDIA offers a lower performing card for less money. This partially-enabled card gets 3072 CUDA cores, 384 tensor cores, and 16GB of GDDR6.

At this point we’re still waiting on more information on power consumption for these cards. But the images NVIDIA has released thus far shows them using a typical NVIDIA blower configuration, so expect sub-250W parts.

Meanwhile NVIDIA has confirmed that all of the cards come with 4 DisplayPort 1.4 outputs. Along with that, all of the cards will feature a 5th output: a VirtualLink-capable USB Type-C port. The recently introduced VirtualLink standard is a USB-C alt mode, and it allows a single cable to carry all of the video, data, and power a VR headset requires, allowing headsets to be directly tethered to a video card without requiring multiple cables. There are no VirtualLink-capable headsets yet, but with Oculus, Valve, and Microsoft all backing the standard, it will only be a matter of time.

Wrapping things up, the new Quadro RTX cards will be available in Q4 of this year. Prices start at $2,300 for the RTX 5000, and quickly get more expensive from there. An RTX 6000 will set buyers back $6,300, while the flagship RTX 8000 will be a full $10,000.

Source: NVIDIA

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • Alistair - Monday, August 13, 2018 - link

    RTX 5000 looks like the GTX 2080? RTX 6000 the next Titan?
  • Arnulf - Tuesday, August 14, 2018 - link

    These are no gaming cards kid, give us a break, you spammed two articles with your ignorant comments.
  • Alistair - Tuesday, August 14, 2018 - link

    Quadro is usually announced after the gaming cards, this time was a little weird.

    The P5000 was basically the same card as the GTX 1080.
    The P6000 was basically the same card as the GTX Titan XP.

    Who is ignorant?
  • Hxx - Tuesday, August 14, 2018 - link

    Gaming cards incoming likely on the same tech.
  • vailr - Tuesday, August 14, 2018 - link

    I could be misinterpreting, but I think one photo they showed indicated a maximum 8x card array with 96 Gb of GDDR6, via 4x pairs of cards, for 8x cards in total. So: 96 Gb total of GDDR6 divided by 8 equals 12 Gb per card as the maximum supported configuration.
  • Ryan Smith - Tuesday, August 14, 2018 - link

    They're using 16Gb Samsung GDDR6 chips, so 24 chips in a clamshell configuration can easily go on to a single video card, resulting in 48GB of VRAM.
  • UnNameless - Tuesday, August 14, 2018 - link

    So the CUDA performance is worse than on a Titan V / V100 !?
  • Drumsticks - Tuesday, August 14, 2018 - link

    Not sure how. Fewer cores, but higher clocks. The FP32 performance looks to be slightly higher.
  • iwod - Tuesday, August 14, 2018 - link

    I am more interested in the plans of AMD? What happens to radeon?
  • HighTech4US - Tuesday, August 14, 2018 - link

    Nothing. As in AMD has nothing to offer.

    Oh they will have a 7nm high-end card sometime this/next year but it will once again fall flat against what Nvidia offers. As for Navi next year that is only a mid-range part.

    So in effect AMD falls further behind.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now