LG Announces VELVET Phone: Korea Only For Now
by Andrei Frumusanu on May 7, 2020 12:00 PM EST- Posted in
- Mobile
- LG
- Smartphones
- 855
- Snapdragon 765
- LG Velvet
LG had been teasing the “Velvet” for several weeks now, trickle-feeding information about the company’s new premium level smartphone. Today, the company officially launches the device in Korea, fully revealing the specifications of the device as well as its pricing.
The LG Velvet isn’t a “true flagship” as it positions itself just one tier below that, featuring a Snapdragon 765 SoC as well as a lesser camera configuration. Where it does stand out is in the design – whilst some might criticise as “standard”, it’s probably LG’s best-looking phone in years. All whilst maintaining a reasonable price tag of around 670 USD.
LG Velvet | |||
V60 | |||
SoC | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 1x Kryo 475 Prime (CA76) @ 2.3GHz 1x Kryo 475 Gold (CA76) @ 2.2GHz 6x Kryo 475 Silver (CA55) @ 1.8GHz |
||
GPU | Adreno 620 | ||
DRAM | 8 GB | ||
Storage | 128 GB UFS 2.1 +microSD |
||
Display | 6.8" FullVision AMOLED 2460 x 1080 (20.5:9) |
||
Size | Height | 167.2 mm | |
Width | 74.1 mm | ||
Depth | 7.9 mm | ||
Weight | 180 grams | ||
Battery Capacity | 4300 mAh (Typical) | ||
Wireless Charging | Qi | ||
Rear Cameras | |||
Main | 48MP f/1.8 w/OIS |
||
Wide | 8MP Super-wide angle |
||
Extra | 5MP Depth |
||
Front Camera | 16MP | ||
I/O | USB 2.0 Type-C 3.5mm headphone jack Fingerprint reader |
||
Wireless (local) | Wi-Fi 6 Bluetooth 5.1 |
||
Cellular | GSM, CDMA, HSPA, 4G/LTE, 5G | ||
Splash, Water, Dust Resistance | IP68 | ||
Dual-SIM | nano-SIM | ||
Launch OS | Android 10 | ||
Launch Price | ₩899,800 (~670 USD pre-tax) |
Internally, the phone is powered by the Snapdragon 765 SoC, which is Qualcomm’s second-highest tier chip this year. Supporting two Cortex-A76 cores, one at 2.3GHz and one at 2.2GHz alongside 6 Cortex-A55 cores at 1.8GHz, it should perform adequately, although it’s still quite behind the flagship Snapdragon 865 phones out there.
LG configures the Velvet with 8GB of DRAM as well as 128GB of UFS 2.1 as base storage configurations, and there’s a microSD slot for expansions.
Dimension-wise, although it shares the same screen diagonal as the LG V60 at 6.8”, the Velvet is a quite smaller phone as the screen curves to the sides and has very narrow side-bezels, resulting in a 74.1mm body width – around the same form-factor as an S20+.
It’s an POLED display with 2460 x 1080 resolution in a 20.5:9 aspect ratio, LG here is lacking any special features such as high refresh rates.
As teased several weeks ago, it’s a quite differently looking LG device as it sports a new industrial design that leaves behind some of LG’s more “practical” approaches of previous generations. Yes it’s still very much a glass sandwich and certainly not anything revolutionary, but I still think it looks quite good in terms of its execution.
The Velvet maintains a reasonable weight and thickness at 180g and 7.9mm – still able to host a 4300mAh battery in its body.
The camera setup was the one big unanswered question in terms of specifications of the phone, but today’s announcement seems quite disappointing in this regard. The phone has a 48MP main camera alongside a measly 8MP ultra-wide-angle and a 5MP depth sensor module. This really is quite below the industry standard at this device level – I just hope that the 48MP module is a decent one as I don’t have much expectations of that UWA.
Other selling-points of the Velvet is the fact that it still features a 3.5mm headphone jack which nowadays is a rarity in new phones.
LG announced the Velvet only in Korea for now at a price of ₩899,800 which corresponds to $670 pre-taxes. It’s an attractive phone, but I feel like it will be a make-or-break matter in regards to its camera abilities. The fact that LG is only releasing the device in Korea at this moment in time suggest that they’re experimenting and waiting out to gauge the reactions before possibly considering a wider device launch. I certainly commend them on the new industrial design of the phone – the company’s certainly on the right path in that regard.
27 Comments
View All Comments
NICOXIS - Friday, May 8, 2020 - link
Look at what you get with similar pricing from the Meizu 17 Pro, this phone has no chance...https://www.anandtech.com/show/15778/meizu-announc...
shabby - Friday, May 8, 2020 - link
Probably just for the Asian market with limited international bands.Cirecomputers12 - Sunday, May 10, 2020 - link
I'd opt for the Realme x2 pro at 350 usd for it's base model. It can't be beat.flyingpants265 - Saturday, May 9, 2020 - link
Jesus, this just looks terrible.pashhtk27 - Saturday, May 9, 2020 - link
LG made good phones. They priced them crazy but they were complete and packed with feature that actually matter. Not this. The only niche this phone serves is those who want to buy a big brand product (in general perception), display/weight ratio, a 'hopefully big battery life' and design aesthetics over anything else. Very Velvet indeed. A product made for the show show crowd with no substance. As a technology lover, I am very disappointed.If you want a better camera system, faster sharper display, better battery life, processor, 5G etc you go for a S20 or OP8Pro.
If you want an LG, you go for the older V50 or G8 on discount that have a faster processor and ESS DAC (The only real reason people buy LG). Weight, design? Those are comparably light and better. Is the notch that big a deal breaker?
And if you really want the latest (As that matters with tiny improvements), LG and 5G, just pull out $100 more and get a V60.
LG declared they will change their strategy and this is the resultant product. People who have never bought an LG won't really care but the existing fanbase of LG will be disappointed. And I personally don't think they'll be getting any new fans unless they thin those profit margins a bit more.
zamroni - Monday, May 11, 2020 - link
That curved edge screen is bad for utilization while increases the price at least $50CameraGuy1337 - Monday, June 1, 2020 - link
It's pretty aesthetic. BUT nothing special without design.