HP has introduced its Pavilion 32 display (V1M69A), which promises to combine large size, QHD resolution, VA panel and affordability. The Pavilion 32 monitor may not appeal to professionals or hardcore gamers, but for mainstream users this one could be a game changer because of its price-point. The monitor will hit the market late next month as a part of HP’s back-to-school product refresh.

Modern day desktop workloads involve a lot of multitasking as well as long documents, large spreadsheets and high-resolution images. For many tasks, big displays are not a luxury, but rather a necessity. However, it is not easy to find a monitor that boasts with a large size, a good quality panel and an affordable price. There are relatively inexpensive 24” and 27” monitors with IPS or VA panels available, but when it comes to models with diagonals like 30” and larger, then it is not easy to find a good quality affordable display. While there are low-priced 32” monitors from unknown brands, they usually feature cheap TN panels and can hardly boast with good quality. Meanwhile, well-known suppliers charge $500 and up for their 32” models, which is more than many people are willing to spend on a display. With its Pavilion 32, HP wants to address the market of affordable monitors with an offering that is currently not available from its rivals.

The HP Pavilion 32 (V1M69A) display uses a 32" WVA+ panel with 2560×1440 resolution, 300 cd/m2 brightness, 3000:1 static contrast ratio, 178°/178° horizontal/vertical viewing angles as well as 60 Hz refresh rate. WVA stands for wide viewing angle, which is a general term to describe various types of panels (including *VA and PLS) used by display makers in their products. HP does not disclose exact type of the panel that powers the Pavilion 32”, but confirms that this is a VA panel (though, we have no idea whether this is AH-VA, A-MVA, etc.), not a TN (which is typically used for low-cost displays). In many ways, the Pavilion 32 resembles the Envy 32 monitor, which HP introduced several months ago. The Envy 32 has a similar WVA+ panel, but features stereo speakers as well as AMD’s FreeSync to appeal to gamers, but it is also more expensive.

Specifications of HP Pavilion 32 and HP Envy 32
  HP Pavilion 32
V1M69A
HP Envy 32
N9C43AA
Panel 32" WVA+ 32" WVA+ with Anti-Glare
Resolution 2560 × 1440
Refresh Rate 60 Hz 60 Hz with AMD FreeSync
Response Time 7 ms gray-to-gray
Brightness 300 cd/m²
Contrast 3000:1
Viewing Angles 178°/178° horizontal/vertical
Color Saturation 100% sRGB
Pixel Pitch 0.276 mm
Pixel Density 91.8 pixels per inch
Inputs 2 × HDMI
1 × DP 1.2
1 × HDMI
1 × MHL
1 × DP 1.2
3.5 mm stereo-in
USB Hub 2-port USB 2.0 hub
Audio None Stereo speakers with Bang
& Olufsen enhancements
Launch Price $399.99 $499.99

The new Pavilion 32 display from HP is equipped with two HDMI and one DisplayPort 1.2 connectors (cables are included in the package). In addition, it has an integrated USB 2.0 hub, which should be enough to connect a keyboard, but which will not be sufficient for modern external USB flash memory drives that support USB 3.0 transfer rates. Keeping in mind that the hub is located on the backside of the monitor, it looks like it was not intended for removable storage in general. The design of the Pavilion 32 allows adjusting tilt, but not height. Asides from that, the monitor cannot be used in portrait mode, which is hardly a problem for the vast majority of its potential buyers.

Select retailers as well as HP’s online store will start to sell the HP Pavilion 32 on June 26 for $399.99. The monitor is covered by a one- or three year-limited warranty.

The key selling points of the HP Pavilion 32 are its relatively low price as well as its VA panel. Right now, the majority of 32” displays with QHD resolution from well-known suppliers cost over $500. By making its product available for $400, HP appeals to a broader audience of users, who currently buy smaller monitors. What remains to be seen is whether other display makers follow HP with their inexpensive 30” QHD parts.

Source: HP

POST A COMMENT

74 Comments

View All Comments

  • ingwe - Wednesday, May 4, 2016 - link

    I stupidly read this as UHD instead of QHD and almost started for my wallet. Anyway at QHD this is just too large for my desires. Reply
  • Flunk - Wednesday, May 4, 2016 - link

    I agree, if it ain't 4K I ain't interested. Reply
  • BrokenCrayons - Wednesday, May 4, 2016 - link

    Until GPU technology advances a little more, I'd rather not drive all the pixels in a 4K screen. There's nothing wrong with doing so, but 1440 is probably okay for a lot of people out there and the price certainly has a lot of appeal. Reply
  • Flunk - Wednesday, May 4, 2016 - link

    I want it for desktop uses, "GPU Technology" has been able to drive 4K at the desktop for years. I have a 15" laptop with a 4K screen already and it has no problems drawing my Visual Studio window. There is little constructive use for a huge screen like this with such a low resolution. Reply
  • zodiacfml - Wednesday, May 4, 2016 - link

    Funny. Same here too. Freesync should be included. Reply
  • CoreyWat - Wednesday, May 4, 2016 - link

    PPI 27in at 2560 × 1440 108ppi, 32in 91ppi (not a huge difference) Reply
  • BurntMyBacon - Wednesday, May 4, 2016 - link

    @CoreyWar: "PPI 27in at 2560 × 1440 108ppi, 32in 91ppi (not a huge difference)"

    It is almost exactly the same pixel density you get from a 1080p 24" monitor. I consider this difference pretty notable and easily differentiable. However, that doesn't make it bad. It is certainly workable.
    Reply
  • MrSpadge - Wednesday, May 4, 2016 - link

    When ever I return from my 25" QHD to my 24" 1920x1200 at work I'm amazed at how large and clumsy everything looks. 92 ppi would definitely be too low for me. Reply
  • Guspaz - Wednesday, May 4, 2016 - link

    Monoprice has a 27" QHD IPS monitor for $299.99... and a 28" 4K IPS monitor for $379.99...

    The only thing notable about this monitor, I guess, is that it's a 32" monitor.
    Reply
  • Icehawk - Wednesday, May 4, 2016 - link

    How about that it is made by a decent vendor? Monoprices monitors don't review all that well. Personally I am popping a chub on this, I have a qhd 27" which is awesome but I have to use scaling, a 32 would probably mean I don't need to and could move my 27" to my secondary display. I game but 60hz hasn't been a problem for me yet so while higher refresh would be nice it isn't a big deal to me. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now