The Compro IP 70 is recommended with some caveats. For casual applications like baby monitoring, the unit makes a compelling case with its price point. The bitrates of the streams are quite low (maximum of 6 Mbps in total) and the optional wireless dongle has no problem in keeping up with them. The unit is also very configurable for the advanced users, but the performance of the camera in other aspects (such as IR kicking in too early) might render it unattractive for that audience.

We also managed to gather some technical data about the Compro IP 70. Compro PR confirmed that the  IP 70 uses a 1.3 megapixel Aptina sensor and an ARM9 based SoC for DSP purposes. The power consumption of the IP camera hovered around 8 - 10 W.

We would like to see some of the missing features such as Power-over-Ethernet and PTZ (pan-tilt-zoom) support even in the entry level models in the future. A better sensor and SoC combination might also help Compro cater to a wider audience.

One of the issues we had with Compro during the IP 540 review was the absence of dealers in the US carrying the model. Thankfully, Compro has moved forward and set up a dealer network in North America now. The IP 70 can be purchased online from Amazon, mWave and GridConnect amongst others.

Video and Image Quality
Comments Locked

16 Comments

View All Comments

  • dac7nco - Thursday, July 28, 2011 - link

    That picture with the banana, altoids, calculators and dolls is the creepiest image I've ever seen in a tech review. Congratulations!

    Daimon
  • GridConnect - Thursday, July 28, 2011 - link

    I am from Grid Connect and we are a re-seller of this product. You can find it on our website here:
    http://www.gridconnect.com/ip70fixedipcamera.html

    I believe as the posting of this article we have the lowest price on this device available, its a very nice cameras as the review said and definitely worth checking out.

    If this comment is read by the author we would appreciate it if you could update the post and put in the link to the product by our name.
  • ArtShapiro - Thursday, July 28, 2011 - link

    Why would a technical review of a product promote one particular vendor of said product?
  • GridConnect - Friday, July 29, 2011 - link

    They have linked to vendors in previous reviews that tell you where to buy it. If they dont want to thats fine, I was just trying to save people a step from having to Google our name, find the product, etc.
  • Hrel - Thursday, July 28, 2011 - link

    Only use I see for these things is security surveillance. Image quality looks WAY above minimum needed for that. Set it up to only record when it detects movement to save space and back it up to hard drives for later review. Still, I've seen whole systems for 200 bucks that include a DVR and 8 cameras. 1 Camera for that price is insane.

    Maybe there's another niche use for networked cameras I haven't imagined? Probably, people do crazy stuff with camera's and tech.
  • GridConnect - Thursday, July 28, 2011 - link

    Actually for these types of cameras with comparable features these are very affordable. Most cameras with all of these features would cost you 3-4x that. The types of systems you are speaking of dont have things like email notifications, movement detection, and monitoring via cell phone just to name a few things.
  • sc3252 - Thursday, July 28, 2011 - link

    Those $200 systems suck! As someone who has setup these cameras you do not want to go cheap, it just means they will fail or something else will go wrong. As they say, "time is money" you will find this out fast if you cheap out on security cameras, you will constantly be driving to and from the place of work to reset the camera or to make sure they are working, and good luck getting a usable picture in court...
    PS: $200 is cheap for a security camera, the cheapest you really want to spend is around $400, going up to $2000 per camera...
  • bobbozzo - Thursday, July 28, 2011 - link

    There seems to be a word or two missing on page 5:
    "so this is something we are not entirely about with the Compro IP 70"
  • ganeshts - Friday, July 29, 2011 - link

    Thanks! fixed :) It was something we were not entirely happy about with the Compro IP 70
  • Nihility - Friday, July 29, 2011 - link

    Is the feed encrypted?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now