Back at Samsung SSD Global Summit in July, Samsung showed off the SM951 for the first time. The drive has then created a lot of interest because the Z97 and X99 chipsets finally brought proper boot support for the XP941 and many have decided to hold off their purchase and wait for the upcoming SM951. 

Similar to the XP941, the SM951 will come in M.2 2280 form factor with capacities ranging from 128GB to 512GB. In terms of the interface the SM951 moves to PCIe 3.0 x4, which doubles the available bandwidth from the XP941, and Samsung is claiming read speeds of up to 2,150MB/s with writes coming in at 1,550MB/s. Random performance isn't as impressive but the SM951 is still capable of up to 130K random read and 85K random write IOPS.

In addition to increased performance, the SM951 also brings power savings. The drive includes support for L1.2 low power standby mode and according to Samsung the idle power consumption is under 2mW (i.e. within the DevSleep spec). The XP941, in turn, uses about 50mW as per Samsung's data sheet, so it's a fairly significant increase in power efficiency.

But now the bad news: the drive does not support NVMe nor does it come with 3D V-NAND. Back in July Samsung's own presentation mentioned that the SM951 would be the world's first client SSD with NVMe support, but those plans has then changed. Currently Samsung has no plans to bring NVMe to the SM951, which leads me to believe that the hardware is not NVMe compatible in the first place. Why that is the case, I don't know for sure, but what I do know is that the current Haswell/Broadwell platforms aren't really designed for PCIe/NVMe SSDs, which is why everyone is looking forward to Skylake before releasing their drives to the market. There are workarounds to get PCIe/NVMe SSDs to work on existing systems, but apparently Samsung decided to stay with AHCI for one more generation for increased compatibility (it's an OEM drive after all, so I'm sure the PC OEMs have had their say about NVMe). 

As for the NAND, the SM951 uses 128Gbit 19nm MLC. That's planar NAND, unfortunately, even though Samsung has been adopting V-NAND to nearly all of its other SSDs. I suspect that the reason behind the choice of planar NAND is PC OEMs and their unwillingness to pay the premium for V-NAND because the truth is that V-NAND is still not as cost efficient as modern planar NAND. Another reason might be the newness of 3D NAND as PC OEMs tend to prefer proven technologies to maximize reliability. 

Since the SM951 is an OEM drive, it won't be available through the usual retail channels, but at least RamCity (the first XP941 retailer) will be carrying the drive. Stock should arrive around March time and I've also heard that there will be a TLC based version called the PM951. All in all, while the SM951 didn't exactly meet my expectations on the specification frontier, I'm eagerly waiting for a review sample to see how the transition to PCIe 3.0 increases performance. We will be getting our review sample as soon as RamCity receives the first units, so look back for the review in about two months.

Source: Samsung Press Release

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • yik3000 - Wednesday, January 14, 2015 - link

    Is it possible to fit one of these in retina macbook pro...i am just wondering if there's any aftermarket option for replacing pcie ssds in rmbp
  • r3loaded - Wednesday, January 14, 2015 - link

    Nope, the rMBP uses a custom connector instead of M.2. Maybe OWC will have aftermarket upgrades available but I know nothing beyond that.
  • jeffkibuule - Wednesday, January 14, 2015 - link

    Not one of these, 2013+ Retina MacBook Pro don't use the M.2 standard. It's possible for someone to make a custom SSD, as OWC will be making for the Mac Pro, but it's quite costly. :(
  • xype - Wednesday, January 14, 2015 - link

    Well, there is this (Amazon carries it, at least in the EU)
  • val1984 - Thursday, January 15, 2015 - link

    SSDs that Transcend offers are SATA drives, unlike the SSDs in mid-2013 MacBook air/retina which are PCI-Express drives. These are compatible with MacBook air 2012/2011/2010 and MacBook Pro retina early 2013/2012 as you can see in the compatibility table.

    There are no aftermarket upgrade options for PCI-Express MacBook SSDs right now. OWC has said it would provide such options but has yet to deliver (though the fact that MacPro SSDs are available is good news):
  • easp - Tuesday, January 20, 2015 - link

    There are finally adapters to allow mSATA and SATA M.2 drives to be used in the mid-2012 and early-2013 rMBPs. Nothing for PCIe rMBPs, yet. Here is to hoping it won't take another year.

    I just found (and ordered) one of these mSATA adapters last night:

    For M.2:

    I ordered on Amazon, they also sell on ebay. It looks like the same stuff is available under the "sintech" brand. Looks like they are also available on AliExpress, if that is an option for you.
  • Galatian - Wednesday, January 14, 2015 - link

    Screw it, why did I wait for this drive? Purchased a ASRock Z97 Extreme9 so I could get all the bandwidth and now they don't bring out an NVMe version. Why wouldn't that work? Is there a hardware requirement? I think you only need Windows 8.1?
  • Hung_Low - Wednesday, January 14, 2015 - link

    Seriously, all SATA SSD improvements are marginal, nothing revolutionarily groundbreaking. Unless NVMe PCIe SSDs becomes more affordable, I won't upgrade from my current SSD.
  • kenshinco - Wednesday, January 14, 2015 - link

    Sm951 is faster than xp941 but not as rated 2150/1150mb/s read/write. Too bad it is not Nvme. So it was a waste of time waiting for it.
  • Troff - Wednesday, January 14, 2015 - link

    What is the problem with the design of broadwell wrt NVMe?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now