It has been expected for some time now that the fallout from Thailand’s well publicized flooding and resulting hard drive shortage would have wider ramifications than just impacting the businesses of Western Digital and Seagate and driving up hard drive prices, and now those other outcomes are finally starting to occur. Today Intel became the latest casualty of the shortage when they announced that they were reducing their Q4’11 earnings estimate from $14.7B in revenue to $13.7B due to the shortage and its impact on new computer sales.

Even though Intel is a moderately diversified business – they have their hands in everything from CPUs to NICs to SSDs – virtually everything Intel sells is tied to the sale of new computers. As the hard drive shortage has continued and existing stocks of hard drives have been emptied the lack of cheap hard drives has made them the de facto bottleneck in computer production, leading to the slowing the production of new computers for both the consumer and enterprise markets. This in turn is directly reducing the demand for Intel’s products, most notably CPUs, and is why Intel has had to revise their earnings estimate down.

Intel notes that Q4’11 computer sales are still up over Q3, which means sales are still rising as they traditionally do, but at this point the lack of hard drives is capping computer sales at a lower level than they would otherwise reach. After the final sales are tallied at the beginning of next year, Q4’11 sales will almost certainly be down versus Q4’10, representing an unusual contraction in an otherwise good year for the PC industry.

Intel’s own guidance suggests that the shortage will continue to dog the company through Q1’12, and only finally begin to abate in Q2’12. It may very well take longer than Q2 for hard drive production to recover, but Intel isn’t speculating out that far. Regardless, Q2 is widely expected to be the launch for their Ivy Bridge CPUs, so it will be in Intel’s best interest for the shortage to come to an end quickly.

Intel of course won’t be the only casualty, but by taking a $1B reduction in revenue (and shaving 0.5% off of their legendary gross margin) they’re among the largest. By the time the shortage ends we’re expecting to still see several more companies and industries take a hit; AMD is a likely candidate for the same reason as Intel, but also NVIDIA & AMD for their GPUs, and the DRAM industry is highly prone to boom/bust cycles – this being at a time where DRAM is already at record low prices. There are very few industries that can go unscathed when 25% of the global hard drive production capacity for Q4’11 disappears overnight.

In Intel’s case they are at least partially diversified against a hard drive shortage through their SSD business, and while Intel doesn’t provide estimates for specific businesses it’s likely to be one of their stronger units for the quarter. Still, SSDs are not great replacements for hard drives (in an economic sense) so strong SSD sales cannot compensate for the significant drop in CPU sales due to the hard drive shortage.

Source: Intel Investor Relations

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • Beenthere - Monday, December 12, 2011 - link

    I doubt the expensive but still available HDs are the real cause of Intel's $1 Billion drop in revenues for the quarter. Perhaps the never ending worldwide economic meltdown is more likely. Ultrabooks are a joke and few people are interested in paying outrageous prices for a label, even with intel bribe money to OEMs.

    AMD on the otherhand is selling virtually every CPU, GPU and APU they can produce. While their sales are compromised with GloFo and TSMC, AMD is still doing OK considering the Fab hurdles they are enduring.
  • frozentundra123456 - Monday, December 12, 2011 - link

    I agree with you that I am not inpressed with the Ultrabook concept, because it is too expensive for the product. I would prefer something like the HP dm1z at half or 1/3 the price.

    But I bet AMD would be glad to have intel's sales and profits. Selling everything you produce at a low ASP is a small positive when the reason is that you have lousy production facilities.
  • BSMonitor - Tuesday, December 13, 2011 - link

    What you are talking about is a Netbook. If you want cheap, there it is.

    The rest of us wanted small footprint with a more powerful set up. SSD's, 17W processors that do not require heavy cooling, and no discrete graphics card. Near instant on.

    Ultrabooks are Macbook Air's that are $200-300 cheaper without the influence of Apple.

    Grow up
  • BSMonitor - Tuesday, December 13, 2011 - link

    "AMD on the otherhand is selling virtually every CPU, GPU and APU they can produce. While their sales are compromised with GloFo and TSMC, AMD is still doing OK considering the Fab hurdles they are enduring. "

    Where are earth did you hear this?? Facts please. Not your wildly inaccurate guesses at AMD's production and sales. AMD losing market share in the profitable business PC and datacenter/server markets. Explain to me how they are selling "ALL" of their CPU's.

    Fanboy, get off the Kool-Aide
  • silverblue - Wednesday, December 14, 2011 - link

    Haha... that's rich, coming from the biggest anti-AMD fanboy on here. :) But I digress.

    Fusion is selling very well (it has sold out in the past) and Zambezi in particular is doing very well; there's a few articles about them if you type in "amd sells out" (no joke) into Google. Server-wise, it's probably a bit inaccurate to say AMD is selling everything it can produce in this area, and the same could be said for their discrete GPUs. Some evidence would be helpful in this case.

    I did read something interesting about AMD's future plans for low-power servers which may be of interest:
  • JonnyDough - Wednesday, December 14, 2011 - link

    to ALL hardware vendors? Kinda sounds like Intel is just trying to make excuses and/or the press.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now