Windows 7 Performance Guide

207 Comments

View All Comments

• xrror - Tuesday, October 27, 2009 - link

  Well businesses that are stuck with an Exchange server and need computers on a Domain for it probably are still interested in a volume license.
  
  Heh, a small SOHO probably just get the "Family Pack"... or just keep running the WinXP machines they have into the ground. Why upgrade at all?

• darwinosx - Monday, October 26, 2009 - link

  Yet another superficial look at Windows 7. Not a word about the registry and it's egregious affect on stability and performance. Not a word about the malware fest that is still Windows. Nothing about Windows very poor utilization of multi-core procs and large amounts of memory. No, its all as if the only thing that matters about an OS is the UI. Is Anand the only one at Anandtech that has taken an operating system class? Is he the only one who knows anything about OS X? It would appear so.
  
  Your brief "comparison" of Snow Leopard and Windows 7 was worse. Of course. It is not a minor upgrade at all unless..you only look at superficial things as you did the Windows 7 review. SL has had a few minor issues affecting a few people. Hardly "teething problems". The only differentiator between 7 and SL is now hardware? Unbelievable. When did Anandtech turn into CNET?
  
  You can barely spell Linux apparently so I don't think we will see any kind of comparison there.
  
  If you don't know anything about OS X or Linux then don't bother to mention ether in the future.

• Genx87 - Tuesday, October 27, 2009 - link

  Did you make a Youtube video about this? lol
  
  

• xrror - Tuesday, October 27, 2009 - link

  Which operating systems can I legally run on hardware I own:
  [X] Linux
  [X] Windows XP
  [X] Windows Server 2003
  [X] Windows Vista
  [X] Windows Server 2008
  [X] Windows 7
  [ ] Mac OS9
  [ ] Mac OSX
  
  When I visit AnandTech what computer trends/items do I find most relevant to me:
  [X] Upcoming and exciting computer technologies
  [ ] The latest and greatest media platform with DRM capitalization
  [X] Upgrades for open and standards based x86 platforms
  [ ] Hacks and modifications for closed x86 platforms
  [X] Price/performance comparisons for gaming hardware
  [ ] Articles denying relation of mal-ware output and OS marketshare

• Griswold - Tuesday, October 27, 2009 - link

  Hello clown boy!

• tomaccogoats - Monday, October 26, 2009 - link

  While I can't support this tirade, I will say Anandtech definitely suffers in Mac and Linux areas. Then again, their slogan is "your source for hardware analysis and news", which I guess doesn't really warrant that it needs to be classed in those areas. Still, the latest Linux articles are August 2009, and then 2005!

• JimmyJimmington - Monday, October 26, 2009 - link

  Mind if I log into your guest account?

• darwinosx - Monday, October 26, 2009 - link

  If thats all you got it isn't much. That is certainly a bug and a highly visible one. But it affects a tiny number of users who upgraded Leopard to Snow Leopard in a very specific way under a certain set of circumstances and even not all of them have the issue. Apple has a fix in 10.6.2 which will be out in a matter of days. To bring that up in the face of the yawning chasm of security vulnerabilities that is Windows 7 is pretty laughable.

• ibarskiy - Monday, October 26, 2009 - link

  Once again, it's time you actually supported your statements with facts. What security chasm? Please cite vulnerabilities and extent to which OSX is not subject to them. And while you are at it, please explain how come it is that Mac OS got broken into faster when the compensation for the break in was the same between Mac OS and (at the time, but for all practical purposes immaterially) Vista [pwn2own 2009]. Oh, and MacOS was broken into twice to Vista's one time. So which again is more secure?

• ibarskiy - Monday, October 26, 2009 - link

  Correction; it was Windows 7, indeed.