General Windows Performance

Quite a few people also asked for some general performance numbers in terms of Windows boot/shutdown, hibernate/resume, and sleep/wake times. These obviously vary quite a bit between runs, depending on what you've been doing on the computer. If you have a bunch of open applications, it will take longer for the system to enter sleep mode for example. We performed these tests on all of the netbooks and laptops from an empty Windows desktop, and we used the best-case result for each system. As a side note, all of these tests benefit greatly from a fast SSD, though again we have to question whether spending a $200+ on an SSD for a $350 netbook makes sense. Regardless, SSDs will help application load times as well as Windows boot/hibernate/sleep times. We also need to note that the NV52 and NV58 run Windows Vista 64-bit, which took noticeably longer in the hibernate/resume tests. That's expected since both Gateway systems have 4GB of RAM, but we also included results with Windows XP 32-bit as a point of reference.

Windows System Performance

Windows System Performance

Windows System Performance

Windows System Performance

Windows System Performance

Windows System Performance

Outside of the Windows Vista notebooks, the Acer 751h tends to place at the back of the pack in these tests. However, boot and resume times are better than the GIGABYTE M1022 by virtue of the fact that Acer has a much faster POST time. Booting, shutting down, hibernating, and resuming are all far more painful to endure than a simple sleep/wake, and it's there that the netbooks do very well. When you combine the great battery life with fast sleep/wake times, you can easily get a full day of work/school done without the need to connect to an AC outlet. Speaking of which, let's look at the battery life comparison.

Netbook Performance Comparison Battery Life and Power Requirements
Comments Locked

30 Comments

View All Comments

  • quiksilvr - Thursday, September 3, 2009 - link

    Hate to burst your bubble but its running Vista BASIC, meaning no free upgrade to Windows 7.
  • bjacobson - Thursday, September 3, 2009 - link

    Think you're wrong dude--
    http://www.acer.com/windows7upgrade/eligible.html">http://www.acer.com/windows7upgrade/eligible.html
    First line, ao751h
  • Etern205 - Thursday, September 3, 2009 - link

    No he's right you're wrong.

    quote by Acer:
    To be eligible for the Program, you must purchase a new PC between June 26, 2009 and January 31, 2010. The PC must come with a valid Windows Vista® Home Premium, Windows Vista® Business or Windows Vista® Ultimate Certificate of Authenticity (COA) attached. In addition, the PC must also have Microsoft Windows Vista® SP1 or SP2 OR a Windows® XP Downgrade with Service Pack 3 installed. /quote

  • bjacobson - Thursday, September 3, 2009 - link

    Eh then buy it, it's worth it.
  • bjacobson - Thursday, September 3, 2009 - link

    and you can see here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_GMA#Table_of_GM...">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_GMA#Table_of_GM...
    that the GMA500 is perfectly capable of accelerating video. If you're using Vista or 7 (sorry, DXVA 2.0 only available on these with the Intel drivers and they're not planning on making 1.0 work for XP...according to the Intel dev guy behind these drivers) grab DXVA Checker as an easy tool to check for video acceleration.
    Installing the free version of PowerDVD9 gets you some codecs which the Intel driver can make use of for accelerating video. For example, Step Into Liquid will only play accelerated through DXVA Checker, showing that the capability for WMV9 is fully there in the hardware, there's just some driver stuff that needs to be worked (might be something on MPC-HC's end, too).
  • JarredWalton - Thursday, September 3, 2009 - link

    I know Poulsbo is supposed to have HD support, which is why I stated: "The Poulsbo chipset is supposed to provide HD codec support, but at present it appears application support for the necessary functions is not there." It appears Windows XP is the problem, based on your linked forum instructions. I'm going to see about putting Win7 x86 on the netbook, just for kicks....
  • JarredWalton - Thursday, September 3, 2009 - link

    I'm trying to follow http://forum.pocketables.net/showthread.php?t=2148">the instructions and having no luck. I get severe stuttering on the AO751h using "PDVD Video SP" in Win7 using either MPC-HC or KMplayer. I know for a fact that MPC-HC with CoreAVC was no better under XP. I'm still trying to figure out how the people actually set up an AO751h to work with x264... KMplayer is crashing right no when I try for fullscreen, but it was working with the Microsoft DTV-DVD codec in a window.

    Bottom line: it *might* work, but getting it going is not as easy as I'd like.
  • bjacobson - Thursday, September 3, 2009 - link

    For more info on accelerating 1080p videos (x264, for example) check out http://www.aspireoneuser.com/forum/viewforum.php?f...">http://www.aspireoneuser.com/forum/viewforum.php?f...

    I had to use the 1006 version of the driver to get DXVA working; note that the 1095 version is actually OLDER so you _don't_ want it.
    MPC-HC had audio stuttering problems with x264 playback for some reason; but K-Lite player works great with configuration (Set AVC, or maybe it was VC.1, or maybe both) decoding to the Microsoft DTV-DVD decoder, and you'll have to change a few other settings (don't recall what exactly-- check that forum, there's guides and links to the places you need to go to configure it correctly for 1080p video playback).

    Again, putting 7 on this, and turning off Window Transparency, and this thing really performs. Loving it, use it every day.
  • sillyfox - Tuesday, September 8, 2009 - link

    Yes
    Related:http://passional-life.over-blog.com/article-353298...
  • bjacobson - Thursday, September 3, 2009 - link

    Oh and don't forget you can get this for cheaper if you pay attention to the Bing Cashback deals on the Hot Deals forum here. Currently 15% back at Tiger Direct, they sell the 1G versions of these laptops. No tax, $2 shipping, brings the total cost to ~$310 + money for a 2G stick of RAM if you want.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now