CPU Benchmark Performance: Simulation And Rendering

Simulation and Science have a lot of overlap in the benchmarking world, however for this distinction we’re separating into two segments mostly based on the utility of the resulting data. The benchmarks that fall under Science have a distinct use for the data they output – in our Simulation section, these act more like synthetics but at some level are still trying to simulate a given environment.

We are using DDR5 memory at the following settings:

  • DDR5-4800(B) CL40

Simulation

(3-1) DigiCortex 1.35 (32k Neuron, 1.8B Synapse)

(3-2a) Dwarf Fortress 0.44.12 World Gen 65x65, 250 Yr

(3-2b) Dwarf Fortress 0.44.12 World Gen 129x129, 550 Yr

(3-2c) Dwarf Fortress 0.44.12 World Gen 257x257, 550 Yr

(3-3) Dolphin 5.0 Render Test

(3-4a) Factorio v1.1.26 Test, 10K Trains

(3-4b) Factorio v1.1.26 Test, 10K Belts

(3-4c) Factorio v1.1.26 Test, 20K Hybrid

When it comes to simulation, the combination of high core frequency and better IPC performance gives Intel's 12th Gen Core series the advantage here in most situations.

Rendering

(4-1) Blender 2.83 Custom Render Test

(4-2) Corona 1.3 Benchmark

(4-3a) Crysis CPU Render at 320x200 Low

(4-3b) Crysis CPU Render at 1080p Low

(4-3c) Crysis CPU Render at 1080p Medium

(4-4) POV-Ray 3.7.1

(4-5) V-Ray Renderer

(4-6a) CineBench R20 Single Thread

(4-6b) CineBench R20 Multi-Thread

(4-7a) CineBench R23 Single Thread

(4-7b) CineBench R23 Multi-Thread

Looking at performance in the rendering section of our test suite, both the Core i7 and Core i5 performed creditably. The biggest factor to consider here is a higher core and thread count plus IPC performance will equal more rendering power.

CPU Benchmark Performance: Power, Office, And Science CPU Benchmark Performance: Encoding and Compression
Comments Locked

196 Comments

View All Comments

  • MartyKinn - Wednesday, April 6, 2022 - link

    Need opinions:

    Should I go for a Surface Pro X SQ1, 128GB/8GB for $700 over a Surface Pro 7+ Core i5, 128GB/8GB for $800?

    I won't be using either for gaming...other than what's available in the Windows Marketplace.

    The Pro X allows for upgrading the storage. Don't know if the Pro 7+ allows that.
  • mode_13h - Wednesday, April 6, 2022 - link

    No idea. I'd read through every review of the X you can find and see if it sounds like it'll fit your needs. Running Windows on an ARM-based CPU still sounds a little risky, but maybe it'll pay off in better battery life? Just a guess.

    Good luck with your decision.
  • MDD1963 - Friday, April 8, 2022 - link

    No offense, but....

    The reviews of these two CPUs seem just a tad.....'late to market'....!
  • romanmungo - Wednesday, April 13, 2022 - link

    windows10/11 office 2016/2019/2021 Want to be our wholesaler?

    The best quality products and pre-sale and after-sale service, become our wholesaler, establish a long-term cooperative relationship, the greater the wholesale quantity, the greater the discount! ! !
  • mode_13h - Thursday, April 14, 2022 - link

    Spammer.
  • iranterres - Wednesday, April 13, 2022 - link

    2-3% better on average then a Ryzen 5600X for twice the power consumption? Does not seem high performance for me.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now