ATI's New Radeon X850 and X800 Lines: A Smorgasbord of GPUs
by Anand Lal Shimpi & Derek Wilson on December 1, 2004 9:41 AM EST- Posted in
- GPUs
ATI Radeon X850 Pro
Out of all of the GPUs being announced today, the Radeon X850 Pro was the only one ATI did not confirm the clock speeds of. While they listed a core clock speed of 520MHz with 1.08GHz memory, we will have to wait until they actually ship the X850 Pro before knowing for sure. That being said, we couldn't resist comparing ATI's upcoming $400 GPU to the competition to see if at ATI's currently spec'd clock speeds, if it could compete.
Compared to the Radeon X800 Pro:
The X850 Pro offers a pretty reasonable spread of performance improvements over the X800 Pro, so it gets our thumbs up as a good replacement product to the X800 Pro. Higher core clock and memory clock will mean better performance across the board, but is a better performing X800 Pro what ATI needs right now?
Compared to NVIDIA's GeForce 6800GT:
Compared to NVIDIA's $400 part however, the X850 Pro tends to disappoint. At these clock speeds, the X850 Pro can only offer a 7.1% performance advantage in Half Life 2, and a 5 - 27% performance deficit in other games. If ATI were launching the X850 Pro at these clock speeds today we'd have to give our recommendation at $400 to the GeForce 6800GT.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
69 Comments
View All Comments
IdahoB - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link
I just hope that the large increase in the variety of cards means that a couple of them which actually be available to buy. It seems that they have more model numbers than physical stock these days. I would have loved a X800 of some description but couldn't find one anywhere in the UK so settled for the still slightly unreliable 6800GT.Araemo - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link
#7: At least it's less confusing than intel's new numbering system. yeesh.StrangerGuy - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link
X800SE,X800,
X800 Pro,
X800 XL,
X800 XT,
X800 XT PE,
X850 Pro,
X850 XT
and X850 XT PE
9 models of high-end ATI cards? Oh man that is really confusing even for enthusiasts and geeks...
Araemo - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link
#4 The 'video processing unit' isn't for playback, it's for encode, and as far as I'm aware, ATI's non-AIW cards don't have hardware encode either.Araemo - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link
I guess my 9700 Pro is safe for another 8-12 months...hopefully.
LoneWolf15 - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link
No-one is mentioning the one thing ATI almost certainly has in its favor: video playback. The GeForce 68xx's "video processing unit" still does not have drivers that take advantage of it, whyever the case may be. ATI has always had a strong tradition of video playback performance. I'd really like to see Anandtech bench CPU usage with these cards with 1080 HD .WMV files, as well as with MPEG-2/MPEG-4. This would be truly useful for enthusiasts and help round out our buying decisions.gibhunter - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link
Ati is looking desperate with this release. Their fastest part is what, 3% faster then their previous champ. On top of that, you still can't find these fastest cards. If they were trying to confuse the customer, they might as well consider it mission accomplished.Personally, I'd just stick with 6800GT and have an upgrade path with an SLI Nforce4 board and another 6800GT in the future.
segagenesis - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link
The X850 Pro is somewhat disappointing vs. its competition, does nVidia even have refresh parts planned for winter? I was looking at the $400 price range myself :(Cat - Wednesday, December 1, 2004 - link
If it means more cards are available for less cost, than I'm all for this. It's still kinda disappointing, though.