GPU Performance

Eurocom offers a wide-range of MXM modules to outfit the Sky X7C as desired, starting at the NVIDIA GTX 1060, and going all the way up to the same RTX 2080 that powers this review unit. The RTX 2080 is currently sits at the top of the product stack for notebook computers, and will likely remain that way for some time unless NVIDIA decides to give the RTX notebook lineup the Super treatment. That does seem unlikely, since one of the biggest changes to the latest RTX Super cards is increased power draw, which is something notebooks would struggle with. NVIDIA rates the RTX 2080 at 80-150W+ officially, meaning there’s a lot of room for the manufacturer to tweak the power draw of the card to match the device it is in, and we’ve already seen that this can play a big factor in overall performance, especially in thin and light laptops.

As an MXM3 module, the Eurocom Sky X7C also offers some upgradability in the GPU department as well, although finding and replacing MXM cards can be an expensive upgrade, but it is at least an option that smaller, soldered notebooks do not even offer.

To see how the Eurocom Sky X7C performs, it’s been tested against a couple of synthetics, and our gaming laptop suite of games.

3DMark

Futuremark 3DMark Fire Strike

Futuremark 3DMark Sky Diver

Futuremark 3DMark Cloud Gate

Futuremark 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited

Futuremark 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited - Graphics

Futuremark 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited - Physics

UL’s 3DMark offers a variety of tests, from the very demanding Fire Strike down to Ice Storm Unlimited, which can be run on a tablet. The Sky X7C is the fastest single-card laptop we’ve tested to date, unsurprisingly, and offers generally more performance than even the 1080 SLI GT83VR Titan, with the exception of Fire Strike which is the most GPU limited test of the bunch. As the tests get less GPU limited, the dramatically faster processor pulls the desktop replacement ahead and keeps it there for the rest of the tests.

GFXBench

GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal 1080p Offscreen

GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High 1440p Offscreen

GFXBench offers DX12 tests with the Aztec Ruins workloads, and as a test that is cross-platform and available for smartphones, it’s not much of a challenge for a system with this much performance. It does appear to be GPU limited though, with the Eurocom neck and neck with the MSI GE75 Raider.

Dota 2

Dota 2 Reborn - Enthusiast

One of the most popular arena battle games is Dota 2, and although this is a game that can be run even on integrated graphics, it can be CPU limited, and the Core i9-9900K drags the Eurocom well ahead of any other RTX 2080 laptop we’ve tested.

Tomb Raider

Tomb Raider - Enthusiast

The original Tomb Raider can still be a challenge for some gaming laptops with lighter GPUs, but not so much for an RTX 2080.

Rise of the Tomb Raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider - Enthusiast

The second installment of the latest Lara Croft series is much more demanding than the original, with some breathtaking imagery in the game. The Eurocom jumps to the top again.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Shadow of the Tomb Raider - Enthusiast

The most recent installment of the Tomb Raider series bumps the visuals yet again, and this DX12 title is still very challenging even at just 1920x1080. Although the Eurocom Sky X7C averages 116 FPS in this test, and is easily playable, that’s well below the refresh rate of many 1920x1080 laptop displays.

Civilization VI

Civilization VI Enthusiast

The current version of Civilization VI tends to be heavily CPU bound, especially on the end-of-turn, and the extra grunt of the Core i9-9900K really shows in this title.

Bioshock Infinite

Bioshock Infinite - Enthusiast

Bioshock was a great franchise, and it’s loss is a loss to all of us, but this game is not a challenge for so powerful a notebook.

Shadow of Mordor

Shadow of Mordor - Enthusiast

The first installment in this game set in Tolkein’s Middle Earth is easily playable on a modern system with an RTX 2080, and the Eurocom Sky X7C breezes through this test.

Shadow of War

Shadow of War - Enthusiast

The latest version of the open world action role-playing series is more demanding of the GPU, and at the highest settings the Eurocom Sky X7C once again jumps to the top of the stack, although not much over the MSI GE75 Raider with the same GPU, meaning this game is more GPU bound than CPU.

F1 2017

F1 2017 - Enthusiast

We always like to include one of the games featuring Codemasters’s Ego engine, and that game is currently F1 2017. The Ego games tend to be more CPU limited than other titles, and that shows with our results.

Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5 - Enthusiast

Despite being a graphical showcase, Ubisoft’s Far Cry 5 is actually one of the most CPU limited of the big FPS games at the moment, so the extra grunt from the i9-9900K really shows through here, with a significant lead over the other RTX 2080 notebooks.

High Resolution Gaming

Although 1920x1080 has dominated gaming for some time, over the last couple of years there has been a surge in the number of high-resolution displays shipping with notebooks, and of course as a Desktop Replacement class computer, the Eurocom Sky X7C can easily be connected to an external display as well, so in addition to our normal 1920x1080 tests, the high-end gaming laptops of recent vintage have also been tested at both QHD and UHD resolutions.

QHD Gaming

When gaming at QHD, even with the RTX 2080, there is still a significant framerate hit, although the faster processor in the Eurocom notebook still helps it pull ahead, especially in Far Cry 5 which is the most CPU limited game of the three.

UHD Gaming

When stepping up to UHD though, the framerate average dips below the 60 FPS you would really prefer to see, even with a Core i9-9900K and RTX 2080 powering the system. If you want to game at UHD, even with the latest hardware you are going to need to adjust the settings to compensate for that resolution, whether manually or using something like the GeForce Experience software to configure the game settings.

This leads to the eternal question of whether gaming is better at UHD but 60 FPS or under, or 1920x1080 with a high-refresh display such as the 144 Hz IPS panel that has been shipping in the last generation. Luckily with the Eurocom Sky X7C, that choice is yours, since Eurocom will configure the X7C with either of those displays, or several others as well, including the 2560x1440 120 Hz panel. If I was buying, I would choose the 144 Hz 1920x1080 with G-SYNC for the ultimate in smoothness, but as with most things about this notebook, there is far more choice available than on most systems.

System Performance Display Analysis
Comments Locked

46 Comments

View All Comments

  • DanNeely - Monday, August 5, 2019 - link

    It's good to see that 1440p laptop screens aren't dead yet (4k is overkill for high DPI uses) even if this model gives a rather poor showing.
  • anactoraaron - Monday, August 5, 2019 - link

    $4,000 machine with literally the cheapest display they could find. Just embarrassing.
  • airdrifting - Monday, August 5, 2019 - link

    While it might be equipped with a desktop 9900K, it will never run the same speed and temperature as desktop counter parts. 9900K is notorious to overheat and I have seen it easily hit high 90C during Realbench with many motherboards WITHOUT overclocking using out of the box default settings (AIO liquid cooling), good luck getting it to run inside a tiny laptop. I have to manually lower voltage on most motherboards just to keep 9900K under 80C full load since most motherboards set like a ridiculous 1.2-1.3V voltage by default.
  • MrRuckus - Monday, August 5, 2019 - link

    If you read the article you would see they did exactly that. Loaded down the proc and were hitting 87c under load. Maintaining 4100-4200Mhz is very commendable in a laptop form factor. There could be more performance to be had by undervolting the Proc. As you say you do it on a desktop, it goes double for a laptop and can do wonders for throttling if there is any present. 80-90c is par for the course on Laptops that are desktop replacements.
  • airdrifting - Tuesday, August 6, 2019 - link

    "Maintaining 4100-4200Mhz is very commendable in a laptop form factor." 9900K on desktop Z390 motherboards is able to maintain 4.7GHz all core turbo. Now go back to read what I said in the very first sentence: "While it might be equipped with a desktop 9900K, it will never run the same speed and temperature as desktop counter parts." 4.1GHz < 4.7GHz, point proven.
  • eastcoast_pete - Monday, August 5, 2019 - link

    Thanks Brett! I have a soft spot for these DTRs (I like the even older name for them: luggables). I wonder if Clevo&Co. could come up with a true hybrid design: portable notebook format with socketed CPU, and the main second GPU in a docking station with integrated large PSU, connected via a PCIE3-16 (or PCIE4) snap-in connector, all in a case with a handle. That would give the graphics more thermal headroom, and avoid the potential bottleneck of running the dGPU over TB3. And, with an optional smaller, maybe GTX dGPU card on board, the laptop itself would still be quite capable.
  • MrRuckus - Monday, August 5, 2019 - link

    I think TB3 is going to be your best bet. I dont think external PCIe is going to be a thing due to length limitations and a needed external connector of some kind. The ribbon connectors aren't exactly made for unplugging and plugging in 100's of times. They have people who have done it, but the implementation is pretty wonky and you gotta have access to a Wifi card slot to do it. If I remember right they are also limited to PCIex1 so the difference between that and thunderbolt, thunderbolt can actually be faster. Just better off getting a laptop with a true thunderbolt 3.0 slot that can push 40gbps = PCIex4. Maybe Thunderbolt 4 will offer a true pound for pound replacement and get the throughput closer to 100% instead of the 70-80% now on external GPUs.
  • imaheadcase - Monday, August 5, 2019 - link

    Um no laptop is a gaming desktop replacement.

    You literally showed it wasn't by the specs. THe price is insanely expensive, and the screen is laughable.
  • bennyg - Tuesday, August 6, 2019 - link

    It's not cheap. The particular panel has just been plagued with issues since it was first put in these 17" models in 2015/2016. The original B173QTN01.0 had horrible banding on alternating rows of pixels and the individual panels are quite variable. This would be a 1.2 or 1.4 revision I'm guessing. A colour calibration is necessary for this panel in particular. But its the only >1080p 120Hz out there.

    I have a P870DM3 with the same 17" 4K IPS panel that's an option for this P775, being 400nit 95% gamut and good colour accuracy it's the content creation and general beautifulness option, but it's transition of >20ms is not great for fast games.
  • bennyg - Tuesday, August 6, 2019 - link

    No idea how my reply got here, it was to the guy bagging the "cheap" panel on about page 4 of the comments.

    Same old stuff going on in the comment section at AT....

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now