MSI MEG X570 Godlike Conclusion

The MSI MEG X570 Godlike is an E-ATX motherboard which sits at the top of MSI's X570 product stack. It has a current price tag of $700 which puts it as one of the most expensive X570 models so far, and on paper it is one of the most feature-packed of all the X570 models. Other models that compete with this in terms of price point are the ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Formula ($700), and the GIGABYTE X570 Aorus Xtreme ($700).

On offer is four full-length PCIe 4.0 slots which operate at x16, x8/x0/x8, and x8/x4/x4, while the bottom slot is locked to PCIe 4.0 x4. The MSI MEG X570 Godlike is the only X570 model with four full-length slots and as a consequence, has no PCIe 4.0 x1 slots. Its storage capabilities are also impressive with three PCIe 4.0 x4 M.2 slots on the board, with two additional PCIe 4.0 x4 drives due to the Xpander-Z Gen4 add-on card in the accessories bundle. On top of this, there are six SATA ports with support for RAID 0, 1, and 10 arrays.

Not only is the rear panel heavily packed with connections including three USB 3.1 G2 Type-A, one USB 3.1 G2 Type-C, and two USB 3.0 G1 Type-A ports, but the accessories bundle is also comprehensive with an Aquantia AQC107 10 G Super LAN card included; the other notable inclusion is six red and black braided SATA cables. Also included on the rear panel is a Flash BIOS and clear CMOS button which are very handy to have. A trio of Killer Networking powered ports including two Ethernet ports powered by an E3000 2.5 G and E2600 Gigabit NIC, but there is also an AX1650 Wi-Fi 6 802.11ax wireless interface which provides users with BT 5.0 connectivity too. Onboard audio is also boosted by the inclusion of an ESS 9018 Sabre DAC driven 6.3 mm headphone output, with a Realtek ALC1220 codec each for the front panel audio connector, and the five 3.5 mm jacks and S/PDIF optical output.

A reoccurring theme throughout the analysis of the MSI MEG X570 Godlike is the quality of the componentry, and its 16-phase power delivery as impressive as any board MSI has released over the last five years. The power delivery is using an International Rectifier IR35201 running at 7+1, with fourteen TDA21472 70 A power stages doubled up with seven IR3599 doublers. On the SoC section, there are four TDA21472 70 A power stages which are interestingly operating from a single IR3599 doubler running in quad mode; not exactly why MSI is using four power stages for the SOC when just two would have been suitable. The MSI X570 Godlike also boasts an impressive number of 4-pin fan headers with a total of nine splits into one for a CPU fan, one for a water pump, and seven for chassis fans. 

On the performance front, the MSI MEG X570 Godlike performed consistently well throughout our CPU and gaming test suites. Power consumption was interesting in our testing with consistently higher than normal power draw in both idle and long idle power states, but matched other boards at peak load. This high idle power is likely due to the sheer number of controllers onboard.At full load, it performed on par with the MSI MEG X570 Ace which either shows the inefficiency of MSI's models at full-load; for reference, the ASUS Pro WS X570-Ace was a good 8 Watts better off at full load.


The MSI MEG X570 Godlike has an impressive accessories bundle

The overclocking performance was fruitful when done manually, with the 14-phase CPU power delivery and firmware doing its job well. MSI's Game Boost overclocking profiles on the other hand in our testing proved woefully inept with very high CPU VCore which in turn, put immense pressure on our 240 mm AIO CPU cooler on the testbed. MSI has reached out to us and stated that this issue will be addressed in the next firmware update. On a more positive note in our new power delivery thermal testing, the MSI MEG X570 Godlike performed very well with our overclocked Ryzen 7 3700X. The large power delivery heatsink is connected to the actively cooled X570 chipset heatsink via an aluminium heat pipe which seems to work very well with a maximum load temperature on the power delivery of 59°C from the integrated sensor, while our external probe on the rear recorded a maximum temperature of 61°C.

Overall the MSI MEG X570 Godlike is highly impressive and is the kind of flagship to get excited about. A lot of the features are overkill and add considerable expense such as the customizable OLED panel, the bolstered onboard audio and four full-length PCIe 4.0 slots. The majority of users aren't going to come close to using all of the Godlike's traits, which does bring questions about who exactly is buying a flagship motherboard at this price.  Nonetheless, it is clear that MSI's Godlike makes a bold statement that MSI is in business when it comes to its X570 product design.

AnandTech Ryzen 3000 CPU and X570 Motherboard Coverage

Power Delivery Thermal Analysis
Comments Locked

116 Comments

View All Comments

  • Oxford Guy - Thursday, August 29, 2019 - link

    "As far as security issues they have both had their own issues over the years, although Intel has had a fair amount more."

    I don't think so. Intel's recent security track record is abysmal when compared with AMD's.
  • Qasar - Friday, August 30, 2019 - link

    Sweetbabyjays the savings you are referring to for the MSI and Gigabyte boards, guess where it goes, the the HSF to cool that CPU, and remember, a 50 or 60 buck cooler, isnt going to cut it. you will need to get a mid high, to a high end cooler to keep that 9900k running at 4.8 ghz. and BTW... so what if the 9900k can hit 4.8 or 5 ghz.. big deal.. the Ryzen cpus are performing with in a few % of the intel equivent cpus while being 600+ MHz slower, all because the IPC is better then intels right now, once the ryzen cpus get their clocks higher, the gap, could flip flop... clock speed isnt the end all be all in performance, IPC is.. and AMD, for the time being, has the better IPC.
    "
    Then you say in another comment "they've won the performance and value games both at once." i never knew 10% less performance is better." it is when, again, the 10% deficit, is also at lower clocks compared it intel, as again.. IPC is better
  • Irata - Thursday, August 29, 2019 - link

    First of all, there are many lower price options for X570.

    And to add to this, a high end Z390 motherboard is not cheaper - you can actually even spend more and if high Ghz is your aim, that is what you will need. Plus a high end ($$$) cooling solution.
  • Sweetbabyjays - Thursday, August 29, 2019 - link

    True there are many X570 boards for cheaper, which in my opinion makes this board in particular, pointless. Spending $700 on an AM4 motherboard is in my opinion pure stupidity.

    The Z390 Godlike motherboard is available for $100 US cheaper. So a product for product comparison. Additionally, there are many other Silicon Lottery QVL Z390's that you can purchase for literally 1/3 of the price of this board. Furthermore, you can overclock a 9900k to 4.8 on pretty much any Z390/370 board.

    If you're planning on getting your 3700x to 4.2GHz, you're not going to get there with a stock cooler, so you still need an expensive cooler.

    AMD's main game is to be the value for money competitor, what i'm saying is a $700 motherboard at AM4 level literally takes that advantage and scrubs it. The only time that Zen 2 CPUs become the value option is when you need more than 8c/16t, or if you're going to go with an older AM4 chipset.
  • AshlayW - Thursday, August 29, 2019 - link

    Then we both agree that this motherboard is pointless. It is, 700 bucks on this is a stupid thing, but when a decent X570 is 150-200 bucks, no problem. 3700X+X570 is hands down the better solution (read: also for gaming builds) than the 9900K+Z390 when all is considered.

    AMD doesn't have to be the "Value for money competitor" anymore, hon, they've won the performance and value games both at once. Ryzen is a premium brand now, and just happens to offer better value also. 3950X will render Intel's entire HEDT completely pointless, and 3900X already does half of it.
  • Sweetbabyjays - Thursday, August 29, 2019 - link

    I totally agree that 3900x and 3950x really are the final nails in the X299 coffin.
  • AshlayW - Thursday, August 29, 2019 - link

    Or you could be a Smart consumer and get a B450 + Ryzen 9 3700X, for the same price as the 9900K alone, and have 90% the performance in every single scenario and having saved over a hundred dollars, considering you didn't have to buy the cooler, also? Oh, and the socket isn't dead-end and actually has an upgrade path.
  • AshlayW - Thursday, August 29, 2019 - link

    Ryzen 7*
  • Sweetbabyjays - Thursday, August 29, 2019 - link

    "B450 + Ryzen 7 3700X" I agree, this is a much more logical approach for most gamers and content creators on a budget.
  • Oxford Guy - Thursday, August 29, 2019 - link

    I'm also wondering why people ALWAYS push the 9900K instead of the 9700K to gamers, when 8 threads is enough for games and will be for long enough.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now